A Street Partners is proud to be SOC Certified for Service Organization
In today's complex and rapidly evolving business landscape, it has become increasingly important for organizations to ensure their internal controls are solidly in place.
Two critical reports that can help provide assurance on such controls are Service Organization Control (SOC) 1 and SOC 2. But how do you determine which report is right for your organization? This blog post will break down the key differences between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports, discuss when each should be chosen, and guide you through the process of preparing for a SOC audit.
SOC 1 reports focus on controls related to financial reporting, while SOC 2 reports focus on controls relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy.
A SOC 1 report primarily focuses on a service organization's internal controls that impact clients' financial reporting. For businesses dealing with institutional clients in the commercial real estate industry, this could be crucial for ensuring accurate and timely tenant billing, rent collection, lease management, and other transactions related to the leasing or selling of office, industrial or retail buildings.
For example, imagine an institutional client entrusting your company with their prestigious office building for sale or lease. They would want assurance that your financial controls are in place so they can confidently rely on the accuracy of the revenue generated from new tenants and leases managed by you.
SOC 2 reports provide assurance on controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. These are becoming increasingly important as the need for data security and privacy grows.
For example, a service organization that stores client information must have strict measures in place to ensure data confidentiality and prevent unauthorized access. A SOC 2 report assesses these types of controls to ensure they're effective and meet industry standards.
SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports differ in their areas of focus, target audience, and compliance considerations; read on to learn which report is the best fit for your business needs.
One of the key differences between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports is their areas of focus and control objectives. A SOC 1 report is specifically designed to evaluate a service organization's internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR).
This means that the auditor will examine the controls that impact the accuracy and reliability of financial statements. On the other hand, a SOC 2 report focuses on controls relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy (commonly known as SACPA).
This includes things like data protection measures, system availability guarantees, secure processing procedures, and more.
For companies operating in industries where data security risks are high due to regulations or client expectations (e.g., banking), a SOC 2 report may be preferred because it focuses on cybersecurity rather than just ICFR.
However for companies with clients who require audits related to financial reporting compliance requirements such as Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX); a SOC-1 audit may be required more often.
For companies specializing in filling buildings with tenants, choosing the right SOC report can be crucial for gaining the trust of institutional clients. Depending on their specific business needs, these companies may require either a SOC 1 or SOC 2 report to provide assurance on their controls related to financial reporting or data security and privacy.
For example, if they handle sensitive customer data like credit card information, a SOC 2 report may be necessary to demonstrate adequate controls around confidentiality and processing integrity.
On the other hand, if the company impacts its clients' financial reporting, such as by providing payroll services or managing accounts receivable, a SOC 1 report would be more appropriate.
When selecting between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports, compliance considerations must be taken into account. For instance, if the service organization processes payments or manages financial data for its clients, it might be required to adhere to regulatory frameworks such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS) or Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX).
In this situation, a SOC 1 report might be needed to demonstrate that appropriate controls are in place. Alternatively, if the service organization deals with customer information or personal data subject to regulation under GDPR or HIPAA laws, they may need a SOC 2 audit focusing on privacy and security controls related to confidential data handling.
To determine which report is best for your organization, it's important to identify your specific needs and requirements, understand regulatory obligations and industry standards, and communicate effectively with stakeholders.
To choose between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports, a service organization must identify its needs and requirements. One way to do this is by assessing the nature of the services provided and how they impact clients' operations.
On the other hand, if a service organization handles sensitive customer data like credit card numbers or personal information, it may choose to undergo SOC 2 audits that focus on controls relevant to security, confidentiality, privacy, availability, and processing integrity.
It is crucial for service organizations to understand the regulatory requirements and industry standards when choosing between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports. Compliance frameworks such as PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR require certain security controls that may be more appropriately assessed in a SOC 2 report.
Similarly, clients in industries such as healthcare or finance may have specific regulatory requirements that need to be addressed by a service organization's controls. By aligning their control objectives with relevant regulations and industry standards, service organizations can ensure that they are adequately addressing client needs while also meeting compliance obligations.
For example, if a service organization handles sensitive customer data requiring strict privacy control measures, it should opt for a SOC 2 report emphasizing confidentiality controls under ISO/IEC 27001:2013 standard.
Clients and other stakeholders can play a significant role in a service organization's decision to choose between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports. It is essential to communicate with them effectively about the advantages and disadvantages of each report type.
For instance, if a service organization provides financial services or processes transactions that impact clients' financial reporting, they may need to consider obtaining a SOC 1 report.
It is important for organizations to effectively communicate with their clients regarding which report(s) they have obtained and what it means for them. Clients need to understand which controls are covered by each audit engagement so they can make informed decisions about risk management.
To prepare for a SOC audit, service organizations should document their controls and processes, conduct readiness assessments, engage experienced auditors, and implement necessary controls and remediation plans.
Service organizations preparing for a SOC audit must document their controls and processes. This involves creating written policies and procedures that detail how the organization manages its operations, identifies risks, implements internal controls, and monitors compliance with regulatory standards.
The documentation process should include clear descriptions of control objectives, including risk assessment criteria to identify potential threats to data security or financial reporting accuracy.
For example, if an organization operates in the healthcare industry and handles sensitive patient information as part of its services, it may need to demonstrate that it adheres to HIPAA regulations by encrypting data during transmission and conducting regular employee training on privacy practices.
Once documented, audits can be conducted by third-party auditors who will verify that these controls are being followed consistently before issuing a SOC report.
Before undergoing a SOC audit, service organizations must conduct a readiness assessment to ensure they are adequately prepared. This assessment involves documenting all controls and processes related to financial reporting or data security and privacy.
The organization should identify any deficiencies in its controls and develop remediation plans to address them before the audit begins.
Additionally, service organizations should engage experienced auditors who can provide guidance throughout the readiness process and suggest areas for improvement. A readiness assessment saves time, effort, and resources during the actual audit since it ensures that all necessary information is readily available for review.
Engaging experienced auditors is crucial when preparing for a SOC audit. A qualified auditor has the necessary skills and expertise to provide an independent and objective assessment of your organization's controls.
They can identify risks, recommend control improvements, and ensure that you are fully compliant with industry standards and regulatory requirements. Moreover, engaging experienced auditors can help you avoid common pitfalls during the audit process such as missing critical controls or failing to document processes adequately.
Implementing necessary controls and remediation plans is a crucial part of preparing for a SOC audit. Service organizations need to have documented controls and processes in place that will be reviewed by a third-party auditor during the SOC audit.
Engaging experienced auditors who specialize in SOC audits can help service organizations understand which controls are relevant to their specific business needs and objectives.
They can also provide guidance on implementing necessary controls and remediation plans, including identifying areas where additional resources may be needed.
It's worth noting that compliance frameworks and regulatory requirements related to information security, risk management, internal controls, data privacy, and third-party assurance continue to evolve rapidly.
In conclusion, obtaining a SOC 1 or SOC 2 report is crucial for service organizations to demonstrate their commitment to maintaining strong controls. While both reports provide valuable insights into a service organization's controls, the choice between them ultimately depends on the business needs and objectives of the organization.
Whether financial reporting or data security and privacy are your key concerns, working with an experienced auditor to assess control objectives is a necessary step in fulfilling compliance requirements and gaining stakeholder confidence.
...
A Street Partners in Southern California and Salt Lake City Utah
.png){kind=small}
